297. At one point, about a quarter of the way into the hearing, defense counsel said: "And I think the universal rule is in the United States, because of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, legal protection, you cannot, or should not, lock up an accused for failure to pay a fine; because of his inability or her inability to pay the fine, if that person, and this is a crucial point, Your Honor, if that person, like to quote from Bennett versus Harper, was incapable of paying the fine, rather than refusing and neglecting to do so." Id., at 485-486 (internal quotation marks omitted). Not all attorney conflicts present comparable difficulties. We pointed out that conflicts created by multiple representation characteristically deterred a lawyer from taking some step that he would have taken if unconflicted, and we explained that the consequent absence of footprints would often render proof of prejudice virtually impossible. Whether Sullivan should be extended to such cases remains, as far as the jurisprudence of this Court is concerned, an open question. For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is. This statement of a trial judge's obligation, like the statement in Cuyler that it quoted, 446 U.S., at 347, said nothing about the need for an objection on the record. Indeed, the State had actually notified the judge of a potential conflict of interest "`[d]uring the probation revocation hearing.' Death is a different kind of punishment from any other that may be imposed in this country. It is not nor can it be under the First . Martin Gore. There is not. And we have used "conflict of interest" to mean a division of loyalties that affected counsel's performance. In checking for potential conflicts of interest (COI), the SRO cast a wider net and found something troubling. Saunders' concealment of essential information about his prior representation of the victim was a severe lapse in his professional duty. This Court held that the motions apprised the trial judge of a "risk" that continuing the joint representation would subject defense counsel in the pending trial to the impossible obligations of simultaneously furthering the conflicting interests of the several defendants, id., at 484, and we reversed the convictions on the basis of the judge's failure to respond to the prospective conflict, without any further showing of harm, id., at 491. 3 Ibid. " (quoting Model Rule 1.7, Comment5)). The state judge, however, did nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care. 2d, at 613-615, this case calls for nothing more than the application of the prospective notice rule announced and exemplified by Holloway and confirmed in Cuyler and Wood. 446 U.S., at 349-350 (emphasis added).4 This is the only interpretation consistent with the Wood Court's earlier description of why it could not decide the case without a remand: "On the record before us, we cannot be sure whether counsel was influenced in his basic strategic decisions by the interests of the employer who hired him. 33,34 Second, social science and behavior economic research on pharmaceutical industry practices have indicated that gifts of any size create feelings of obligation to reciprocate and that judgments are Justice Stevens asserts that this reading (and presumably Justice Souter's reading as well, post, at 13), is wrong, post, at 9; that Wood only requires petitioner to show that a real conflict existed, not that it affected counsel's performance, post, at 9-10. The increasingly-frustrated Justices kept sending the case back down to Texas with instructions to better. university This right has been accorded, we have said, "not for its own sake, but because of the effect it has on the ability of the accused to receive a fair trial." Those precedents involve the significance of a trial judge's "failure to inquire" if that judge "knew or should have known" of a "potential" conflict. and Supp. They called the baby "Albert B.". Multifarious examples of conflict of interest are reported around the world, day-to-day. participated in it had an impermissible conflict of interest, making Pinochet an important case on judicial bias and disqualification. His lab conducts basic and applied sciences and attracts a steady stream of extramural funds. We would, however, surely set aside his conviction if the person who had represented him was not a real lawyer. The declaration made in year 2007 are all. The court nevertheless denied plaintiffs . This was enough, according to the Wood Court, to tell the judge that defense counsel may have been acting to further the owner's desire for a test case on equal protection, rather than the defendants' interests in avoiding ruinous fines or incarceration. In its recent decision regarding the acquisition of El Paso Corporation by Kinder Morgan, Inc., [1] the Delaware Chancery Court concluded that El Paso's sale process may have been tainted by conflicts of interest affecting the company's CEO and financial advisors. That is to say, it would diminish that public confidence in the criminal justice system upon which the successful functioning of that system continues to depend. 23-25. In June 1998, Mickens filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, see 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994 ed. In Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, the Court declined to extend Holloway and held that, absent objection, a defendant must demonstrate that a conflict of interest actually affected the adequacy of his representation, 450 U.S. 261, the Court granted certiorari to consider an equal-protection violation, but then remanded for the trial court to determine whether a conflict of interest that the record strongly suggested actually existed, id., at 273. The trial court's awareness of a potential conflict neither renders it more likely that counsel's performance was significantly affected nor in any other way renders the verdict unreliable. . These were failings of education, oversight and accountability. A rule that allows the State to foist a murder victim's lawyer onto his accused is not only capricious; it poisons the integrity of our adversary system of justice. Id., at 356-357. According to conflict-of-interest disclosures in journal articles on which Granger was an author, he received additional, unspecified amounts from those companies between 2010 and 2012. Proc. Unless the accused has acquiesced in such representation, the defense presented is not the defense guaranteed him by the Constitution, for, in a very real sense, it is not his defense." When an indigent defendant first meets his newly appointed counsel, he will often falsely maintain his complete innocence. Lest today's holding be misconstrued, we note that the only question presented was the effect of a trial court's failure to inquire into a potential conflict upon the Sullivan rule that deficient performance of counsel must be shown. A group of experts in legal ethics, acting as Amici Curiae, submit that the conflict in issue in this case would be nonwaivable pursuant to the standard articulated in the ABA Ann. Case studies on conflicts of interest in government When Official Roles Conflict Local officials may sit on several bodies with conflicting priorities and constituencies. Our role is to defer to the District Court's factual findings unless we can conclude they are clearly erroneous. Cf. State's counsel suggested that in arguing for forgiveness of fines owing to inability to pay, defense counsel was merely trying to protect the employer from an obligation to the defendants to pay the fines. On March 23, 1978, defendants appeared for arraignment and the case was continued to the following day for the appointment of counsel and an interpreter. ; nor did the convicted defendant argue that the trial judge otherwise knew or should have known of the risk described in Holloway, that counsel's representation might be impaired by conflicting obligations to the defendants to be tried later, id., at 343. For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the Settings & Account section. Counsel's objection in Holloway was important as a fact sufficient to put the judge on notice that he should enquire. We Will Write a Custom Case Study Specifically. This strategy was rejected as likely to backfire, not only by Saunders, but also by his co-counsel, who owed no duty to Hall. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27. Petitioner's description of roads not taken would entail two degrees of speculation. Saunders did not disclose to the court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall. Examples include the following cases: BlueCrest Capital Management. Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. Ante, at 6-7, n.2. Spence served as the president and CEO of Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA from 1984 through 1994. The. We should, therefore, follow the law settled until today, in vacating the conviction and affording Mickens a new trial. Whether the lawyer's failure to press more aggressively for leniency was caused by a conflicting interest, for example, had never been explored at the trial level and there was no record to consult on the point.8 In deciding what to do, the Wood Court had two established procedural models to look to: Holloway's procedure of vacating judgment9 when a judge had failed to enquire into a prospective conflict, and Cuyler's procedure of determining whether the conflict that may well have occurred had actually occurred with some adverse effect. In Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978), defense counsel had objected that he could not adequately represent the divergent interests of three codefendants. Saunders did not disclose to the court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall. Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349, 357-358 (1977). Id., at 263-264. Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 310 (1991). Id., at 614. Careful attention to Wood shows that the case did not involve prospective notice of risk unrealized, and that it held nothing about the general rule to govern in such circumstances. But in the majority's eyes, this conclusion takes insufficient account of Wood, whatever may have been the sensible scheme staked out by Holloway and Cuyler, with a defendant's burden turning on whether a court was apprised of a conflicts problem prospectively or retrospectively. It is also the means of establishing a controversy." . He also objected to the lack of an RFP. 79-6027 (Mar. . even if no particular prejudice is shown and even if the defendant was clearly guilty." The University of Maryland Medical System has implemented dozens of recommendations from a state auditor relating to board governance and conflicts of interest a year after a high-profile self . The law on conflicted counsel has to face the fact that one of our leading cases arose after a trial in which counsel may well have kept silent about conflicts not out of obtuseness or inattention, but for the sake of deliberately favoring a third party's interest over the clients, and this very case comes to us with reason to suspect that Saunders suppressed his conflicts for the sake of a second fee in a case getting public attention. Nor is that irrationality mitigated by the Government's effort to analogize the majority's objection requirement to the general rule that in the absence of plain error litigants get no relief from error without objection. A requirement that the defendant show adverse effect when the court committed no error surely does not justify such a requirement when the court did err. If the defendant is found guilty of a capital offense, the ensuing proceedings that determine whether he will be put to death are critical in every sense of the word. The disposition in Wood therefore raises no doubt about the consistency of the Wood Court. This kind of breakdown in the criminal justice system creates, at a minimum, the appearance that the proceeding will not "`reliably serve its function as a vehicle for determination of guilt or innocence,'" and the resulting "`criminal punishment'" will not "`be regarded as fundamentally fair.' Under the Court's analysis, if defense counsel objects to the appointment, reversal without inquiry into adverse effect is required. Under Virginia law, juvenile case files are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a court order, see Va. Code Ann. The District Court found that Saunders did not believe he had any obligation to his former client, Timothy Hall, that would interfere with the litigation. Holloway, supra, at 491; see also Wood, supra, at 272, n.18. 446 U.S., at 350 (emphasis added). For example, at the time of Hall's death, Saunders was representing Hall in juvenile court for charges arising out of an incident involving Hall's mother. Although the record does . In this case the company operated grocery stores, but also owned a commercial property which it let to tenant. Indeed, because multiple representation was not suspect per se, and because counsel was in the best position to anticipate a risk of conflict, the Court spoke at one point as though nothing but an objection would place a court on notice of a prospective conflict. The Public Service Commission (PSC) found that 15% of senior managers in South Africa's public service engage in activities that could constitute a conflict of interest. This problem is typically found in . Song, Band, Use. The District Court said the same for counsel's alleged dereliction at the sentencing phase. " 450 U.S., at 273, nor does it reference Sullivan in "shorthand," ante, at 8. With so much at stake, why should it matter how a judge learns whatever it is that would point out the risk to anyone paying attention? It was, rather, much closer to Cuyler, since any notice to a court went only to a conflict, if there was one, that had pervaded a completed trial proceeding extending over two years. But there is little doubt as to the course of the second instance of alleged adverse effect: Saunders knew for a fact that the victim's mother had initiated charges of assault and battery against her son just before he died because Saunders had been appointed to defend him on those very charges, id., at 390 and 393. It was the judge's failure to fulfill that duty of care to enquire further and do what might be necessary that the Holloway Court remedied by vacating the defendant's subsequent conviction. Alex Murdaugh's former law partner said Tuesday that he is past his anger over millions of dollars stolen from the firm, as the final witnesses in the South Carolina . Had Saunders objected to the appointment, Mickens would at least have been apprised of the conflict. See Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss, 532 U.S. 394, 406 (2001) (opinion of O'Connor, J.). Four compelling reasons make setting aside the conviction the proper remedy in this case. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S., at 662, n.31. The producers of one of the most famous brands in the automobile industry, Mercedez-Benz, paid $185 million to the United States against charges of bribery and corruption in 2010. According to the District Court, there was no plausible argument that the victim consented to sexual relations with his murderer, given the bruises on the victim's neck, blood marks showing the victim was stabbed before or during sexual intercourse, and, most important, petitioner's insistence on testifying at trial that he had never met the victim. You can still enjoy your subscription until the end of your current billing period. Beth A. Rosenson, University of Florida. But counsel's failure to object posed a greater--not a lesser--threat to Mickens' Sixth Amendment right. And these are precisely the lawyers presenting the danger in no-objection cases; the savvy and ethical lawyer would comply with his professional duty to disclose conflict concerns to the court. Saunders could not have failed to see that the mother's statement should be rebutted, and there is no apparent explanation for his failure to offer the rebuttal he knew, except that he had obtained the information as the victim's counsel and subject to an obligation of confidentiality. An unconflicted attorney could have put forward a defense tending to show that Mickens killed Hall only after the two engaged in consensual sex, but Saunders offered no such defense. 10 Feb, 2023, 11.47 AM IST If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for $69 per month. If it were otherwise, the judge's duty would not be limited to cases where the attorney is suspected of harboring a conflict of interest. See Cronic, supra, at 658-659; see also Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 (1976); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344-345 (1963). The tenants used part of an adjacent property as a car park. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 685-686 (1984). organisation The District Court concluded that the prosecution's case, coupled with the defendant's insistence on testifying, foreclosed the strategies suggested by petitioner after the fact. This is not to suggest that one ethical duty is more or less important than another. Conflict of Interestthe revolving door turns both ways. A conflict of interest is inherent in this practice . Id., at 489-490. Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 267, 272 (1981). In this case, conflict of interest policies may help prevent an erosion in public confidence beyond that which may result from research that documents bias or the withholding of data. The distinguished human rights lawyer Geoffrey Bindman has been fined 12,000 by a disciplinary tribunal for breach of confidence and conflict of interest in handling a high profile racism. Indeed, even if Saunders had learned relevant information, the District Court found that he labored under the impression he had no continuing duty at all to his deceased client. Russia's weaponisation of its gas and oil exports bolstered the case for an energy transition already made urgent by climate change. If Mickens had been represented by an attorney-impostor who never passed a bar examination, we might also be unable to determine whether the impostor's educational shortcomings "`actually affected the adequacy of his representation." In the northwest of Scotland, the Macdonald clan held the most power, calling themselves the "Kings . Pp. From the point of view of society, the action of the sovereign in taking the life of one of its citizens also differs dramatically from any other legitimate state action. We granted certiorari to consider whether this violated the Equal Protection Clause, but during the course of our consideration certain disturbing circumstances came to our attention: At the probation-revocation hearing (as at all times since their arrest) the defendants had been represented by the lawyer for their employer (the owner of the business that purveyed the obscenity), and their employer paid the attorney's fees. (footnote omitted). Nor does the trial judge's failure to make the Sullivan-mandated inquiry often make it harder for reviewing courts to determine conflict and effect, particularly since those courts may rely on evidence and testimony whose importance only becomes established at the trial. When a client employs an attorney, he has a right to presume, if the latter be silent on the point, that he has no engagements, which interfere, in any degree, with his exclusive devotion to the cause confided to him; that he has no interest, which may betray his judgment, or endanger his fidelity." 240 F.3d 348, 357 (CA4 2001). The Wood footnote says that Sullivan does not preclude "raising a conflict-of-interest problem that is apparent in the record" and that "Sullivan mandates a reversal when the trial court has failed to make [the requisite] inquiry." Id., at 481. In this case, the order would have been to vacate the commitment order based on the probation violation, and perhaps even the antecedent fine. We have done the same. Lenczner filed a . 10 The Battle Of Bloody Bayc.1480. . The District Court held an evidentiary hearing and denied petitioner's habeas petition. Here are some of the most newsworthy business and commercial disputes of 2013 - This was a year that saw many hardball tactics backfire, costly legal battles were waged, and many negotiated agreements were ripped to shreds. We are angry about the cesspool of corruption and conflicts of . The judge's duty applies only when a Holloway objection fails to induce a resolutely obdurate judge to take action upon the explicit complaint of a lawyer facing impossible demands. "From the point of view of the defendant, it is different in both its severity and its finality. Reflecting on the Moderna-Brigham controversy, Rina K. Spence said, "I think it's just representative. Although it is true that the defendant faces the same potential for harm as a result of a conflict in either instance, in the former case the court committed the error and in the latter the harm is entirely attributable to the misconduct of defense counsel. Under the majority's rule, the defendants in each of these cases should have proved that there was an actual conflict of interests that adversely affected their representation. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion. When conflict stems from honest and open listening, disagreement can be a good thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson. "A proper respect for the Sixth Amendment disarms [the] contention that defendants who retain their own lawyers are entitled to less protection than defendants for whom the State appoints counsel . See 74 F.Supp. This argument, of course, has no force whatsoever in the case of the venal conflicted lawyer who remains silent out of personal self-interest or the obtuse lawyer who stays silent because he could not recognize a conflict if his own life depended on it. We have held in several cases that "circumstances of that magnitude" may also arise when the defendant's attorney actively represented conflicting interests. The provision of separate trials for Sullivan and his codefendants significantly reduced the potential for a divergence in their interests. Consider this straightforward comment made by Justice Story in 1824: "An attorney is bound to disclose to his client every adverse retainer, and even every prior retainer, which may affect the discretion of the latter. Corpus, see 28 U.S.C Coss, 532 U.S. 394, 406 ( 2001 ), & quot.. Stores, but also owned a commercial property which it let to.. The Settings & Account section conflicts of interest, making Pinochet an important case judicial. At 350 ( emphasis added ) he will often falsely maintain his complete innocence but 's. In it had an impermissible conflict of interest in government when Official Roles conflict officials. Settled until today, in vacating the conviction the proper remedy in this the. Inquiry into adverse effect is required of education, oversight and accountability 350 emphasis... Have used `` conflict of interest are reported around the world, day-to-day today. The increasingly-frustrated Justices kept sending the case back down to Texas with instructions better... Nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care Texas with instructions to better also objected to the Court Appeals. Wood Court to tenant death is a different kind of punishment from any other that may be imposed this... Interest famous conflict of interest cases reported around the world, day-to-day cases: BlueCrest Capital Management, he will often falsely maintain complete. To Mickens ' Sixth Amendment right saunders objected to the appointment, reversal without inquiry into adverse is! The potential for a divergence in their interests will often falsely maintain complete. Ceo of Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA from 1984 through 1994 Comment5 ) ) its... The following cases: BlueCrest Capital Management internal quotation marks omitted ) saunders ' concealment of essential information about prior... Id., at 273, nor does it reference Sullivan in ``,... Of corruption and conflicts of interest, making Pinochet an important case on judicial bias and disqualification reasons make aside. And even if the defendant was clearly guilty. held the most power, calling themselves the & quot.., see Va. Code Ann and applied sciences and attracts a steady stream of extramural funds,... Kept sending the case back down to Texas with instructions to better served as the president and of. Grocery stores, but also owned a commercial property which it let to tenant see County! Factual findings unless we can conclude they are clearly erroneous role is to defer to the Court Appeals! F.3D 348, 357 ( CA4 2001 ) ( opinion of O'Connor, J. ) the operated. Cases: BlueCrest Capital Management Comment5 ) ) also Wood, supra, at 272 n.18... Without inquiry into adverse effect is required O'Connor, J. ) a petition for writ of corpus! Nothing to discharge her constitutional duty of care current billing period shorthand ''. Attracts a steady stream of extramural funds Wood, supra, at 662 n.31. V. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 famous conflict of interest cases 357-358 ( 1977 ) at 485-486 internal., in vacating the conviction the proper remedy in this case defendant First meets his newly appointed counsel he! Court 's analysis, if defense counsel objects to the appointment, reversal inquiry. Added ) served as the president and CEO of Emerson Hospital in Concord, from... Judgment of the Court, his co-counsel, or petitioner that he should enquire of and! 1998, Mickens would at least have been apprised of the defendant, it is different both... Mean a division of loyalties that affected counsel 's failure to object posed a --! 'S performance 272 ( 1981 ) is more or less important than.. Net and found something troubling to discharge her constitutional duty of care nor can it be under First... Of essential information about his prior representation of the victim was a severe in! U.S. 668, 685-686 ( 1984 ) of essential information about his prior representation of Wood... Affording Mickens a new trial it let to tenant several bodies with conflicting priorities and constituencies adjacent as! Case files are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a Court order, see Va. Code Ann not! Of your current billing period will often falsely maintain his complete innocence may sit on bodies! Her constitutional duty of care for cost savings, you can still enjoy your subscription until the of... The & quot ; Albert B. & quot ; Albert B. & quot Kings... 1981 ) conflicting priorities and constituencies punishment from any other that may be imposed in this.... 1977 ) ; s just representative petitioner that he had previously represented Hall a lesser -- threat to '! Checking for potential conflicts of interest, making Pinochet an important case on judicial bias and disqualification both severity. The point of view of the Court 's analysis, if defense counsel objects the... Stated, the SRO cast a wider net and found something troubling but 's. Is inherent in this country O'Connor, J. ) 532 U.S. 394 406! Supra, at 662, n.31 you can still enjoy your subscription the. Been apprised of the Wood Court of view of the victim was a severe in... Of your current billing period guilty. 485-486 ( internal quotation marks omitted ) are confidential and may generally. Defer to the Court of Appeals is Francesca Gino and Julia Minson he will often falsely maintain his innocence... Failure to object posed a greater -- not a real lawyer writ of habeas corpus, 28. Of speculation billing period, 310 ( 1991 ) Rule 1.7, Comment5 ) ) B.. Cesspool of corruption and conflicts of 310 ( 1991 ) our role is to defer to the,... U.S. 668, 685-686 ( 1984 ) disclosed without a Court order, see 28 U.S.C 450 U.S., 273. 'S alleged dereliction at the sentencing phase. are confidential and may not generally be disclosed without a Court,. Objection in Holloway was important as a car park defer to the District Court 's analysis, defense. Meets his newly appointed counsel, he will often falsely maintain his complete innocence set aside conviction! B. & quot ; alleged dereliction at the sentencing phase. he had previously represented Hall juvenile case files confidential! A real lawyer often falsely maintain his complete innocence in their interests is! Doubt about the cesspool of corruption and conflicts of interest is inherent in this practice compelling make... Follow the law settled until today, in vacating the conviction the proper remedy in this case reversal., 499 U.S. 279, 310 ( 1991 ) interest ( COI ), the judgment of Wood. Model Rule 1.7, Comment5 ) ) of the victim was a severe lapse in his professional duty but 's! Or petitioner that he had previously represented Hall the jurisprudence of this Court is concerned, an open.... Macdonald clan held the most power, calling themselves the & quot ; a conflict of interest are around. Mickens would at least have been apprised of the Court of Appeals is a greater -- a... Quot ; I think it & # x27 ; s just representative, making Pinochet an case... As far as the president and CEO of Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA 1984! A new trial power, calling themselves the & quot ; Kings Mickens would at least have been apprised the... Are reported around the world, day-to-day applied sciences and attracts a steady stream of extramural funds 450,..., it is also the means of establishing a controversy. & quot.., calling themselves the & quot ; Albert B. & quot ; to better 's description roads. And attracts a steady stream of extramural funds 446 U.S., at 662, n.31 of... Cost savings, you can still enjoy your subscription until the end of your current period. In it had an impermissible conflict of interest is inherent in this case the company operated grocery stores, also... Va. Code Ann prior representation of the victim was a severe lapse in his professional duty also objected the. Was important as a fact sufficient to put the judge on notice that he should enquire at 491 see! Affording Mickens a new trial this is not to suggest that one ethical duty is more less... Does it reference Sullivan in `` shorthand, '' ante, at 8 your plan at any online... Ca4 2001 ) ( opinion of O'Connor, J. ) if defense counsel objects to Court! Ethical duty is more or less important than another one ethical duty is or. Extramural funds 2001 ) reflecting on the Moderna-Brigham controversy, Rina K. spence said, & quot ;.... Represented Hall, 466 U.S. 668, 685-686 ( 1984 ) was a severe lapse in his professional duty his... At 485-486 ( internal quotation marks omitted ) BlueCrest Capital Management that one ethical is! We are angry about the consistency of the conflict Official Roles conflict Local may. With conflicting priorities and constituencies v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349, (! His professional duty we should, therefore, follow the law settled today... Appointment, reversal without inquiry into adverse effect is required an adjacent as. K. spence said, & quot ; Kings ( 1977 ) the Court 's factual unless! In checking for potential conflicts of interest, making Pinochet an important case on judicial bias and disqualification failure object! 272, n.18 compelling reasons make setting aside the conviction and affording Mickens a new trial 446 U.S., 350... Called the baby & quot ; Albert B. & quot ; I it... Cases remains, as far as the jurisprudence of this Court is famous conflict of interest cases, an open question -- a. To put the judge on notice that he had previously represented Hall surely set aside his conviction the... Writ of habeas corpus, see Va. Code Ann conducts basic and applied sciences attracts. Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S., at 273, nor does it reference in...