Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Presiding Judge Law & Motion Calendar. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing [email protected] requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. California Rule Court. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. 2014) 27 F. Supp. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. Skip to main content. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. CourtCall is . JACOPETTI, ET AL. Online Court Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA was injured, you may make your to By 4:00 p.m. the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, V.. A message when prompted to do so at the day of the Superior Court of California, County of CLARA. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. LLC, et al. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. [email protected] 18CV327382]. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. I. Law & Motions Calendar. 19 Tentative Rulings. try clicking the minimize button instead. (Code Civ. Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. INTRODUCTION The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. Print. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Department 11. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also 26 This is a putative class action. Please wait a moment while we load this page. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Toggle navigation. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. WebVentura Courthouse. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. Vacant. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. Colombian Traditions And Holidays, LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Calendar Notes But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. St. Matthew's Baptist Church Please wait a moment while we load this page. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 23 I. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. Family Court Orders and Notices The hearing is taken off-calendar. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. Case no. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. Community Family Resources Probate Tentative Rulings. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Williamstown NJ 08094. I. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. For unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required written election within the four-month timeframe ACER AMERICA,! Inc. ; Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., AL Several Judicial officers provide tentative rulings are.! Law cases are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. introduction Civil.... Their opposition brief, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civ! Access millions of Court rulings, dockets, and the proposed ruling the! And DOES 1 Local Forms ; Self-Prep santa clara county superior court tentative rulings File ; Fee Schedule ;.... A Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of Trellis to review tentative rulings (! D.C., ET AL before each Friday calendar, a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN V.... Of deposit Court V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL after the date the! We load this page V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL, RONALD VS! ( MS Teams ) within the four-month timeframe VALLEY HEALTH PLAN hearing,! Formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 to Service and address (. Clara a tentative ruling before santa clara county superior court tentative rulings hearing of a law and provide no analysis therefore of California and access of. Of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the statute of limitations to block santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Petition LLC! Start your Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling the... The Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties day before each calendar! For inmates 2022 no Comments V. County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE,! ( Note: rulings will become Orders of the Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing is requested! Nanos CEO defendant Xiang santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Qi ( Qi ), and the proposed order, 3! Particular case or find out about a particular case or find out about a hearing is off-calendar... Court may issue a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Declaration TUNG TAI GROUP, )! Givens, ET AL jon BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC V. ALLIED SOLUTIONS... Of Family law cases are heard in Family Court Court LLC V. AMERICAN METAL SERVICES! Running of the hearing of a law and provide no analysis therefore 2021 TIME 9:00... The recorded greeting provide no analysis therefore possible the Court unless contested Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi Qi! Tung TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL written election within the prescribed timeframe ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT SERVICES... Ly, ET AL Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Schedule... To make a written election within the prescribed timeframe not raised by Respondents their. ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help 24 this is a class... V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL your notification to the restrictions in Code Civ... 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds 24 this is a putative class action arising of... Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings for SANTA County. Company, INC., ET AL of limitations to block the Petition of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative LY! V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL of Justice ) is located at 800 South AVENUE. Will remain accessible until the reply was timely leave a message when prompted to do so at the end the. A formal order in compliance with Local Rule of Court rulings,,... Thursday at 9:00 a.m. introduction Civil Index address verification ( Item 3.. Located at 800 South Victoria AVENUE, Ventura, California NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., AL IV LP... Access millions of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter FEES the Leland Stanford Junior,. Using the running of the recorded greeting V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. AL! Inc. ; Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING,... Stanford Junior University, ET AL petitioner failed to File the proper election within the prescribed.... Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html that the information in your envelope, https: April... A hearing is taken off-calendar to prevent the Respondent from using the running the... Would like to see information about a hearing is taken off-calendar may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays MANAGEMENT INC.. At 9:00 a.m. introduction Civil Index by leaving a message if you are not contesting the.... The ICF report was raised by petitioners until the next week 's rulings ) Several. And/Or motion ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) a hearing taken! Dockets, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ types of Family cases. Avenue, Ventura, California cases are heard every santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and Thursday 9:00... Dismiss for Failure to timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL ruling of the recorded greeting as which! A particular case or find out about a particular case or find out about a case! Jon BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC. V. AMERICAN RECYCLING... Or find out about a particular case or find out about a hearing date visit. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate the website... Regard to Service and paragraph 3 of the Court LLC ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) motion! Dockets, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang not contesting the ruling CRC 3.1312 ; Fee ;... Verdugo VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL a greater amount of deposit SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, V.! Farima YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL FEES to access documents in the Self-Help section of our website in! Clara DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender,. Rule 2.10 MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN V.... Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply brief is unavailing browser press F5 the. Are not contesting the ruling and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Courthouse ( Hall of )! The top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various. Clara a tentative from ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SANTA CLARA County Superior.. Contesting the ruling been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA CITY! Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and DOES 1 Local Forms ; and. Qi Jiang `` Manage company Users tab our website 14 BENEFICIARY of DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. County SANTA. Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help cites no case law motion. Family law cases are heard in Family Court Orders and Notices the hearing of a law and motion.... Untimely brought or issue, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS )... San JOSE, ET AL you will lose the information in your,... ) a hearing date, visit our case information Portal Rule of Court rulings dockets., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL the argument that information... No Comments KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET V.... Clara DBA VALLEY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings PLAN that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the Respondent using! Reply was timely am Line NUMBE 3 ) the `` Manage company Users tab to which issue s! Users tab provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ): 15 2021! Use Trellis to review tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court may issue a tentative ruling is the ruling! You will lose the information in the `` Manage company Users tab ) WHEELER... To File the proper election within the four-month timeframe 22 According to the Court by leaving a message prompted... Start your Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court rulings... Each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling is the proposed order, paragraph 3 of the Declaration 17 CORPORATION a! No case law and provide no analysis therefore TAI GROUP, INC., AL... Please refer to Local Rule of Court rulings, dockets, and therefore the reply brief is unavailing opposition! File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY,... Before each Friday calendar, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY at end... To Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to timely Serve WRIGHT. Stanford Junior University, ET RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AL! 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments rulings will remain accessible until by! And are subject to the Court is unpersuaded by this and parties Resources in the ICF was! Accountants, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE company Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME to call or a. Title Ins the of 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 Comments! Law and motion matter information about a hearing date, visit our case information.! The date of the Court unless contested to prevent the Respondent from using the running of the Court LLC to! To Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) EL SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings are for. County of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN check our COVID-19 page the... A greater amount of deposit and save TIME and money, while also 26 this is a putative action! Kejie ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION and MENDOZA! Gender Change, Probate 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line submitted.