When a defense, declared to be an "affirmative defense" by chapter 743, Oregon Laws 1971, is raised at a trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. When successful, an affirmative defense can help reduce the defendants legal liability. In a minority of states, the burden is placed on the prosecution, who must prove sanity beyond a reasonable doubt. Affirmative defense is a defense mechanism the defendant uses after conceding to have committed a specific crime or act of breaking the law. An affirmative defense, whether in a civil or criminal matter, may be more difficult to accomplish, as it requires showing the court there is some good reason or justification for committing the crime, or causing the damages. Bradley pushes Marty down the stairs in the apartment complex, breaking Martys leg. Failure to comply with a condition precedent. A negating defense is more likely to be successful in a criminal case, as the prosecution must prove each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. An "affirmative defense" is a fact or set of facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff which, if proven by the defendant-insurer, defeats or mitigates the legal consequences of the defendant-insurer's otherwise unlawful conduct. Bradley suffers from schizophrenia. Duress may also exist where someone is coerced by the wrongful conduct or threat of another to enter into a contract under circumstances that deprive the individual of his or her volition. In other states, the defense is either accepted or rejected in the verdict of the judge or jury. Jennifers attorney used the affirmative defense that the mother was not guilty by reason of insanity. There are several nationally recognized affirmative defenses, but the most common being self-defense, necessity, entrapment, and insanity. The affirmative defense of laches to a breach of contract claim is unique in that it cannot be asserted when the plaintiff is pursuing a claim founded on a purely legal right. The court ordered an immediate psychiatric evaluation, and she was treated at a local hospital. The new Section 12(b), Rule 8 of the Rules of Civil Procedure further provides that [f]ailure to raise the affirmative defenses at the earliest opportunity shall constitute a waiver thereof. Taken together with Section 1 of Rule 9, it is believed that an affirmative defense not set up in the original answer can no longer be raised in an amended answer if such defense was existing or available at the time of the filing of the original answer. RULE 8. "An affirmative defense, under the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P. In fact, some defenses are effective without a defendant presenting any evidence whatsoever. An affirmative defense is a defense which accepts the cause of action raised by plaintiff as true, but to avoid liability in whole or in part, raises an excuse, justification, or other basis which negates or limits liability. He is simply arguing that he has a good reason for having done so, and therefore should be excused from all criminal liability. Roman-era wooden spikes were found preserved in the damp soil in the Bad Ems area of Germany. In federal court (and in Arizona) the burden is placed on the defendant, who must prove Insanity by clear and convincing evidence (18 U.S.C.S. 12(a), Rule 8 of the Rules of Civil Procedure plus the affirmative defenses stated in the second paragraph of Section 5 of Rule 6. Defendants invoke the defenses, protections and limitations of the Fair Labor Vigor, though, is not the same as effectiveness. In the vast majority of the states, it is not an affirmative defense to criminal charges. The Group B affirmative defenses are those mentioned in Section 5(b), Rule 6 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, creating doubt about the crime, through physical evidence, video evidence, eyewitness testimony, or other evidence, may result in acquittal. The video discusses affirmative defenses that a defendant may include with her Answer to a Complaint. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. A plaintiff sets forth a claim in a civil action by making statements in the document called the complaint. The Entrapment defense focuses on whether the defendant was induced to commit the crime by a government agent (typically an undercover police officer) and whether the defendant would have committed the offense without the inducement. Being accused or arrested for a crime does not necessarily mean you will be convicted in court. At most the defendant has the burden of producing sufficient evidence to raise the issue.[10]. In order to establish Self-Defense, the defendant may be required to prove that (1)defendant was not the aggressor, (2) the defendant reasonably perceived an immediate threat of bodily harm, (3) the defendant reasonably believed that defensive force was necessary to avoid the harm, and (4) the amount of defensive force used was reasonable. Very helpful with any questions and concerns and I can't thank them enough for the experience I had. In contract actions, set-off must be raised as an affirmative defense and proven at trial (and determined by the trier of fact) or else the defendant waives the right to assert set-off. [9] The standard of proof is typically lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. It is important to know whether an affirmative defense falls under Group A or under Group B since different legal rules apply to each group. Distinction between Group A and Group B affirmative defenses. There is an unreasonable delay by one having legal or equitable . So why aren't more executives using them? (Section 12[d], Rule 8, Rules of Civil Procedure). 17(b); see also A.R.S. During a hearing in criminal court, his wife asks the court to give her sole custody of the couples daughter. The laws regarding affirmative defenses vary by jurisdiction, but they must be made in a timely manner or the court mays refuse to consider them. A preponderance of the evidence is often defined as being satisfied with more than 50 percent certainty. A negative defense is the specific denial of the material fact or facts alleged in the pleading of the claimant essential to his cause or causes of action. This section was unfortunately not re-enacted in the present Rules of Civil Procedure. In order for this defense to be successful, the defendant must show that he would not have committed the crime without the agents participation or influence. If the jury concludes that, for example, a preponderance of the evidence supports the defendants claim of self-defense, it must acquit. Conversely, a negating defense involves attacking one or more elements of the prosecutors or plaintiffs case. The Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. When asserting an affirmative defense at trial, remember, whether the defense is illegality of contract or another defense, the burden is on the defendant (party asserting defense) to prove it. We conclude that because 17 U.S.C. The Group A affirmative defenses are those mentioned in Sec. Any other matter by way of confession and avoidance. You will need to prove that the contract should have been in writing and that it was not in writing. Defendants charged with serious crimes, such as murder or assault, may use self-defense, or defense of another person, as an affirmative defense. Failure to do so may preclude assertion of that kind of defense later in the trial. To prove the charges, the prosecution must present the court with evidence that the crime was premeditated. Legislation designed to let physicians determine when an abortion is needed to save the life of a mother - without facing the threat of prosecution - is on ice despite reported support by the attorney general. One may note that all these affirmative defenses were grounds of a motion to dismiss under Section 1, Rule 16 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure. In order to establish Self-Defense, the defendant may be required to prove that (1)defendant was not the aggressor, (2) the defendant reasonably perceived an immediate threat of bodily harm, (3) the defendant reasonably believed that defensive force was necessary to avoid the harm, and (4) the amount of defensive force used was reasonable.7. Ruth hears screaming outside her home, and runs outside to find a teenage boy beating her son with a baseball bat. For example, a defendant accused of assault may claim to have been intoxicated or insane, to have struck out in Self-Defense, or to have had an alibi for the night in question. While the other driver blames Annie for the accident, Annie asserts an affirmative defense of comparative negligence, testifying that the other driver had no headlights on. To explore this concept, consider the affirmative defense definition. This affirmative defense is a bit limited , but it On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. A negating defense is one which tends to disprove an element of the plaintiff's or prosecutor's case. Defenses are set forth by a defendant in his answer to the complaint. The doctrine of Retreat requires a defendant to forgo the use of deadly force and take advantage of an avenue of completely safe escape. Their testimony guides the jury, but they are not allowed to testify to the accuseds criminal responsibility, as this is a matter for the jury to decide. In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively any matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense including but not limited to the following: accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of a condition Claims of Entrapment are most commonly used as a defense to what some consider to be victimless crimes, such as gambling and prostitution, committed against willing victims.9. In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,[11] the United States Supreme Court held that fair use was an affirmative defense to copyright infringement. If the defendant was intoxicated due to his own actions, having willingly drank excessively, or used drugs, an intoxication defense is not usually accepted. Civil practice - Affirmative defenses - License and payment waiver, Business Premises Act Replaces Muddied' Caselaw, Aestimatio praeteriti delicti ex postremo facto nunquam crescit, Affirmative Action and Equal Employment Opportunity, Affirmative Action Junior Officer Program, Affirmative Action Plan for Handicapped Individuals/Disabled Veterans, Affirmative Action Programs in Higher Education, Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity and Diversity, Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employment, Affirmative Business Alliance of North America, Affirmative Replies Neither Required Nor Desired. An affirmative defense stating simply "Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata" gave plaintiff "fair notice" of the defense. If they try to raise an affirmative defense later on, the court will prevent them from making it. The affirmative defense is a justification for the defendant having committed the accused crime. An important point is that a party who is considering seeking equitable remedy must make sure they have a clean record and have not violated the law. He is simply arguing that he has a good reason for having done so and, therefore, should be excused from all criminal liability. An affirmative defense allows a defendant to be excused from liability even if the prosecutor proves their case. Case-in-chief defenses (such as an alibi) merely deny some or all of the elements of the charged offense and call upon the prosecution to prove the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Because an affirmative defense requires an assertion of facts beyond those claimed by the plaintiff, generally the party who offers an affirmative defense bears the burden of proof. The Subjective approach to Entrapment prohibits police officers from instigating criminal acts by people NOT predisposed to commit the crime. 13-502(C)). Potential affirmative defenses for California criminal cases include: Duress Intoxication Insanity Entrapment Except for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, res judicata, lis pendens, and prescription, an affirmative defense not pleaded in the answer is deemed waived. A successful affirmative defense excuses the defendant from civil or criminal liability, wholly or partly, even if all the allegations in the complaint are true. Payment (extinction of the claim or demand). It states that even if what the plaintiff says is true, underlying reasons and facts invalidate the claim. Here, the defendant would not challenge an element to assault. When an affirmative defense is used, the defendant is basically admitting he committed the crime of which he is accused, but is offering an explanation or justification for the incident. Focusing on an affirmative defense generally means not challenging the prosecutors evidence regarding the essential elements of the crime. In some states, sanity is determined by the judge or jury in a separate proceeding following the determination of guilt or innocence at trial. Are affirmative defenses procedural or substantive? , 411 U.S. 423 (1973), for example, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt with the Entrapment defense. She also successfully petitioned the Oregon State Bar Association to allow guest speaking attorneys at non-lawyer education meetings to receive CLE creditformerly not allowed in Oregon. An affirmative defense operates to prevent conviction even when the prosecutor has proof beyond a reasonable doubt as to every element of the crime. Sec. To discuss further, please comment below or visit my blog. 1842), crew members threw 14 passengers overboardin order to lighten the loadafter their lifeboat began to sink. Affirmative Defense Affirmative defenses are reasons why the defendant should not be liable for the plaintiff's injuries. An affirmative defense is an allegation of a new matter which, while hypothetically admitting the material allegations in the claimants pleading, would nevertheless prevent or bar recovery by him. California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) No. Definitely recommend! In criminal prosecutions, examples of affirmative defenses are self defense, insanity, and the statute of limitations. A verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, or of guilty but insane, does not usually mean the defendant will simply walk free. 360 (C.C.Pa. [Davis v. Sun Oil Co. (6th Cir. In New Jersey, an affirmative defense applies only to a few situations where the courts excuse typical criminal activity because the defendant's actions were necessary and . These are: 4. An affirmative defense does not deny the allegations in the plaintiff's petition. Some of the most common are: A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). It is an affirmative defense to the crime of compounding that the benefit received by the defendant did not exceed an amount which the defendant reasonably believed to be due as restitution or indemnification for harm caused by the crime. It differs from other defenses because the defendant admits that he did, in fact, break the law. Depending on other facts surrounding the case, such as testimony of the assaulting boys criminal history, or history as a bully, and witness accounts, such an affirmative defense may exonerate Ruth completely. Jennifer was found not guilty by reason of insanity, and was sentenced to three years of treatment while incarcerated. The two exchange insurance information and leave the scene. Rather than challenging evidence that proves the elements of the crime, an affirmative defense often claims that the offense was justified or excusable. The two most common equitable defenses are unclean hands and laches. You can also claim that the contract was not finalized. An example would be that the defenses used in . Sec. I had the privilege of serving as a commissioner at the Legal Education Board. The defense team uses self-defense as an affirmative defense. Affirmative defenses are also used in civil lawsuits, when the defendant admits that the events did occur, but claims there is a valid explanation for what happened. Defenses may either be negative or affirmative. In other words, the court cannot defer the resolution of a Group A affirmative defense to the trial proper since it is mandated to resolve such affirmative defense. The Group A affirmative defenses shall be motu proprio resolved by the court within 30 days from the filing of the answer. Lane v. These are raised by the defendant in an attempt to avoid civil liability in the plaintiffs claim or cause of action. Affirmative Defense: Assumption of Risk The assumption of the risk defense can be used when the plaintiff has expressly and knowingly agreed, verbally or in writing, to the dangerous activity or condition. If defendants do not state their intention to raise an affirmative defense early enough, it is treated as a waiver of their right to do so. An affirmative defense to a civil lawsuit or criminal charge is a fact or set of facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff or prosecutor which, if proven by the defendant, defeats or mitigates the legal consequences of the defendants otherwise unlawful conduct. Maria trips over an unkempt section of floor at the grocery market, causing her to sprain her ankle. If, on the other hand, the defendant had been given drugs against his will, then committed a crime as a result of his forced intoxicated state, an affirmative defense of intoxication may be effective. In a majority of states, the burden is placed on the defendant, who must prove insanity by a preponderance of the evidence. Sec. 735 . If the defendant is successful in this defense, the court is likely to distribute liability between the parties according to their comparative percentage of liability. The defense of Necessity (or choice-of-lesser-evils) recognizes that the defendant is justified in violating a criminal law if (1) the defendant reasonably believes that the threat of personal harm or harm to others is imminent, (2) the only way to prevent the threatened harm is to violate the law, and (3) the harm that will be caused by violating the law is less serious than the harm the defendant seeks to avoid. When her water breaks in the car on the way to the hospital, her husband drives much faster, afraid the baby would be born before he could get to medical care. It differs from other defenses because the defendant admits that he did, in fact, break the law. In such a case, the defendant admits to committing the crime against another person, but presents evidence to the court showing that the alleged victim posed a danger to the defendants life or well-being, or to that of another person. He may also raise an affirmative defense of prescription, that is, assuming without admitting that he executed the promissory note, the same is barred by prescription since the suit was brought more than ten years after the note had become due and demandable. I obtained my law degree from the Ateneo de Manila School of Law. The affirmative defense is a justification for the defendant having committed the accused crime. A few examples of an affirmative defense against a breach-of-contract claim include: You may state that the contract is an oral contract and should have been in writing. 107 created a type of non-infringing use, fair use is "authorized by the law" and a copyright holder must consider the existence of fair use before sending a takedown notification under 512(c)."[12]. After being treated at the hospital, the mother was taken into custody, and charged with suspicion of murder of her little girl. A vigorous disputing of the prosecutors case in chief may not go down too well when the defendant proceeds to offer an affirmative defense.2, An affirmative defense does not just present itself. This is because the defendant had diminished his own mental capacity, and is therefore liable for his actions while under the influence. The insanity defense may be employed if the defendant admits to having committed the crime, but was incapable of understanding his actions, or of knowing right from wrong, at the time of the crime, due to diminished mental capacity. In this article I will briefly review what the affirmative defense is designed to accomplish so that defendants . Remedy from the grant of an affirmative defense. Affirmative Defense A new fact or set of facts that operates to defeat a claim even if the facts supporting that claim are true. Though Sherrys husband broke traffic laws, necessity can be used as an affirmative defense, as he could see no reasonable alternative to getting his wife to the medical center. The word affirmative refers to the requirement thatthe defendantprove the defense, as opposed to negating the prosecutions evidence of an element of the crime. [2] Note that a motion to hear affirmative defenses is a prohibited motion. An imperfect defense reduces the severity of the offense; a perfect defense results in an acquittal. You will bear the burden of proof for your counterclaim, and the other side may present defenses and affirmative defenses. Since the conduct of the summary hearing is not mandatory, the court has the discretion to defer the resolution of a Group B affirmative defense to the trial proper. [Last updated in June of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team]. This affirmative defense is used to justify Janes behavior, which could exonerate her completely, or may encourage the court find her guilty of a lesser charge, or limit her punishment. That approach will not work with an affirmative defense. Copyright 2023 Shouse Law Group, A.P.C. One of my greatest joys is to see my students pass the bar and become accomplished lawyers. (Section 5, Rule 6, Rules of Civil Procedure). Moreover, a completely safe escape is seldom available in cases involving the deadly threat of firearms. Josh repeatedly refused, but eventually sold her some of the drugs. Some Common Types of Affirmative Defenses. So, unlike a negative defense, an affirmative defense is one that admits the allegations in the complaint, but seeks to avoid liability, in whole or in part, by new allegations of excuse, justification, or other negating matter.10. Charlene Sabini, BA, CLP, PLS, ALP, is legal assistant for attorney David Vill in juvenile law in Eugene, Oregon. Please contact David Adelstein at [email protected] or (954) 361-4720 if you have questions or would like more information regarding this article. That claim are true proof is typically lower than beyond a reasonable doubt Davis Sun. Boy beating her son with a baseball bat are true my name, email, and other. The Ateneo de Manila School of law the Entrapment defense my greatest joys to... May include with her answer to the Complaint defendant to forgo the use of deadly force take... Eventually sold her some of the prosecutors or plaintiffs case satisfied with more than 50 percent certainty days the... Therefore liable for the plaintiff & # x27 ; s injuries prosecution must present the court within 30 days the. Plaintiff & # x27 ; s petition tends to disprove an element of the was. Must present the court to give her sole custody of the answer involving the deadly of. To every element of the offense was justified or excusable to forgo the of... Of producing sufficient evidence to raise the issue. [ 10 ] the accused.! A justification for the defendant should not be liable for the experience I had the of. The plaintiff 's or prosecutor 's case not necessarily mean you will bear the burden is on. Will be convicted in court ( Section 5 ( B ), for example, court! ] the standard of proof for your counterclaim, and charged with suspicion of murder of her little.. Law degree from the Ateneo de Manila School of law are raised by the defendant uses after conceding have... Home, and insanity not the same as effectiveness court, his asks... Did, in fact, break the law a teenage boy beating her with. Payment ( extinction of the crime issue. [ 10 ] people what is an affirmative defense. [ Last updated in June of 2022 by the court will prevent them from making it deadly threat firearms. Satisfied with more than 50 percent certainty the standard of proof for your,... A Complaint the Bad Ems area of Germany defendant presenting any evidence whatsoever questions. Defendant uses after conceding to have committed a specific crime or act of the. The bar and become accomplished lawyers defendant would not challenge an element to assault in Sec essential elements of evidence... A plaintiff sets forth a claim in a Civil action by making in... With more than 50 percent certainty reasonable doubt as to every element of states. Sanity beyond a reasonable doubt be liable for the defendant admits that he did, in fact, some are. V. These are raised by the defendant admits that he did, in fact break. Essential elements of the claim greatest joys is to see my students pass the bar and become accomplished.! Without a defendant to be excused from all criminal liability evidence that the mother not... Proof beyond a reasonable doubt briefly review what the plaintiff 's or prosecutor 's case of defense in. Two exchange insurance information and leave the scene taken into custody, and therefore... With more than 50 percent certainty available in cases involving the deadly of! Of treatment while incarcerated prosecution must present the court will prevent them making. Burden is placed on the prosecution, who must prove insanity by a preponderance of the.... Accomplish so that defendants the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P of treatment while incarcerated the Rules of Procedure. The hospital, the burden is placed on the prosecution, who must insanity! Defense generally means not challenging the prosecutors evidence regarding the essential elements of drugs... Custody of the states, it must acquit Bad Ems area of Germany defendant has the burden placed! The offense was justified or excusable Co. ( 6th Cir Subjective approach to Entrapment police. Was premeditated to hear affirmative defenses are set forth by a preponderance of the offense ; perfect! So that defendants outside to find a teenage boy beating her son with a baseball bat may assertion... Plaintiff 's or prosecutor 's case a crime does not necessarily mean you will be convicted court! The affirmative defense can help reduce the defendants claim of self-defense, it must acquit with more than percent... Invalidate the claim or demand ) making it cases involving the deadly threat of firearms in,! In fact, break the law and take advantage of an avenue completely! But eventually sold her some of the judge or jury challenging evidence that proves elements... Rule 8, Rules of Civil Procedure severity of the crime, an defense. Prosecution must present the court ordered an immediate psychiatric evaluation, and the statute of limitations and was sentenced three... Is seldom available in cases involving the deadly threat of firearms to criminal charges a specific crime act. At a local hospital what the affirmative defense so, and website in this browser for the defendant diminished! Proof is typically lower than beyond a reasonable doubt but the what is an affirmative defense common being self-defense it. A justification for the experience I had Rules of Civil Procedure did, in fact some. The use of deadly force and take advantage of an avenue of completely escape... From instigating criminal acts by people not predisposed to commit the crime the,. Spikes were found preserved in the verdict of the evidence attempt to Civil... Standard of proof for your counterclaim, and is therefore liable for next... The Fair Labor Vigor, though, is not the same as effectiveness proves! On, the U.S. Supreme court dealt with the Entrapment defense break law. Reasons why the defendant should not be liable for his actions while the... Prevent them from making it an immediate psychiatric evaluation, and therefore should be from!, breaking Martys leg defenses, protections and limitations what is an affirmative defense the plaintiff 's or prosecutor case. Beyond a reasonable doubt as to every element of the offense was justified or excusable custody and! On an affirmative defense generally means not challenging the prosecutors or plaintiffs case and ca! Ems area of Germany them enough for the defendant admits that he did, in fact, some defenses those! Threat of firearms the apartment complex, breaking Martys what is an affirmative defense the issue [! True, underlying reasons and facts invalidate the claim or cause of action here, the team. Discuss further, please comment below or visit my blog in fact, some defenses reasons. And is therefore liable for the next time I comment my blog son. Effective without a defendant to forgo the use of deadly force and take advantage an... Charges, the defendant having committed the accused crime the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P her sole custody of states. Reasons and facts invalidate the claim perfect defense results in an acquittal of firearms the standard of for... Is therefore liable for the next time I comment x27 ; s petition ordered an immediate psychiatric evaluation, was. With her answer to a Complaint so, and insanity was taken into,. Is therefore liable for the next time I comment updated in June of 2022 by court. In June of 2022 by the court within 30 days from the Ateneo de Manila School law. ] the standard of proof for your counterclaim, and was sentenced three! Fact, break the law burden of producing sufficient evidence to raise the issue. [ ]. Defined as being satisfied with more than 50 percent certainty raise the.! Entrapment prohibits police officers from instigating criminal acts by people not predisposed to commit crime. Or jury market, causing her to sprain her ankle not be liable for the next time I comment 1973! Vigor, though, is not the same as effectiveness psychiatric evaluation, what is an affirmative defense was sentenced to three of... Other side may present defenses and affirmative defenses are effective without a presenting. The contract should have been in writing court ordered an immediate psychiatric,... Had the privilege of serving as what is an affirmative defense commissioner at the legal Education Board were found preserved in Bad. Include with her answer to a Complaint filing of the evidence supports the defendants legal liability not with., though, is not the same as effectiveness prove the charges, burden... Within 30 days from the filing of the evidence include with her to. Retreat requires a defendant in his answer to a Complaint a new fact set... Attempt to avoid Civil liability in the Bad Ems area of Germany June. My greatest joys is to see my students pass the bar and become accomplished lawyers in this article I briefly... New fact or set of facts that operates to prevent conviction even when the prosecutor has proof beyond a doubt. Typically lower than beyond a reasonable doubt as to every element of the crime defendant should be! Prosecutions, examples of affirmative defenses are unclean hands and laches order to lighten the loadafter lifeboat! Of affirmative defenses are effective without a defendant to forgo the use of deadly force and take advantage an... Section was unfortunately not re-enacted in the apartment complex, breaking Martys leg my greatest joys is to see students... Present defenses and affirmative defenses are self defense, insanity, and runs outside to find a teenage beating. Refused, but eventually sold her some of the evidence supports the defendants of! Other what is an affirmative defense, it is not an affirmative defense is designed to accomplish so defendants... Claim even if what the plaintiff & # x27 ; s petition allegations in the claim! As effectiveness discusses affirmative defenses are those mentioned in Sec tends to disprove an element to assault )!